News, updates and analysis
Monthly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · July 2026
Based on June 2026 data, we tracked 115 top-tier CS2 matches across 28 prediction models with a total of 1926 predictions. The average model accuracy was 59.9%, with a spread of 48.3% between the best and worst performing models.
TIER3 takes the top spot with 73.3% accuracy, followed by ELOHQ at 72.6% and VANGUARD at 70.0%.
TIER3 showed strong performance with 73.3% accuracy across 30 predictions (22 correct, 8 wrong). Best week: W24 at 84.6%, weakest: W26 at 0.0%.


ELOHQ showed strong performance with 72.6% accuracy across 62 predictions (45 correct, 17 wrong). Best week: W27 at 100.0%, weakest: W26 at 0.0%.


VANGUARD showed strong performance with 70.0% accuracy across 30 predictions (21 correct, 9 wrong). Best week: W23 at 85.7%, weakest: W26 at 0.0%.


Below is the complete ranking of all models. Models highlighted in blue are in the top 3. The bar chart shows relative performance at a glance.

Not much to report this week — the calendar landed between events. From June 22 through 28 only two matches on the top / major tier reached completion, which is far short of what we normally need for a meaningful model breakdown.
Our weekly digest normally ranks all 20+ models by accuracy across the week's premium matches. With just 2 matches:
So instead of pretending, here's the actual state.
The calendar picks up sharply from here — TI2026 Regional Qualifiers are still active, and higher-tier lineups roll into July. Model accuracy stats will start being meaningful again as soon as those matches settle. Watch the Models page for live leaderboard positioning, and the Matches feed for what's scheduled.
A note on our methodology: we intentionally hold the "Model of the Week" post to at least 3 predictions per model. If we can't clear that bar, we say so instead of publishing noisy rankings. Full model accuracy across all time windows is always available on the Models leaderboard.
— The cs2predict team
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 26 · Jun 15 – Jun 21, 2026
This week (Week 26 · Jun 15 – Jun 21, 2026) we analyzed 16 top-tier CS2 matches across 23 prediction models. SURGE dominated with 78.6% accuracy (11/14 correct), ahead of ELOFACE at 66.7%. SURGE achieved a Brier Score of 0.201 and Log Loss of 0.6194.
SURGE had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 11 out of 14 matches.
SURGE showed excellent performance with 78.6% accuracy across 14 predictions (11 correct, 3 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

11/14 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| FURIA 0-3 Falcons | 79% Falcons | CORRECT |
| TDK 2-0 100 Thieves | 67% TDK | CORRECT |
| Virtus.pro 0-2 ex-RUBY | 67% ex-RUBY | CORRECT |
| Spirit 1-2 Falcons | 76% Falcons | CORRECT |
| Aurora 0-2 FURIA | 73% FURIA | CORRECT |
| Falcons 2-1 Vitality | 83% Falcons | CORRECT |
| G2 1-2 Spirit | 67% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Aurora 2-0 BetBoom | 73% BetBoom | WRONG |
| Nuclear TigeRES 2-1 Nemesis | 53% Nuclear Ti | CORRECT |
| TDK 1-2 Nemesis | 57% Nemesis | CORRECT |
| PsychoFace 1-2 Virtus.pro | 91% PsychoFace | WRONG |
| Natus Vincere 1-2 G2 | 62% Natus Vinc | WRONG |
| BetBoom 2-0 FUT | 77% BetBoom | CORRECT |
| 9z 2-0 The MongolZ | 70% 9z | CORRECT |
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 25 · Jun 08 – Jun 14, 2026
This week (Week 25 · Jun 08 – Jun 14, 2026) we analyzed 39 top-tier CS2 matches across 26 prediction models. STRONGHOLD dominated with 100.0% accuracy (6/6 correct), ahead of NEXUS at 90.0%. STRONGHOLD achieved a Brier Score of 0.0919 and Log Loss of 0.36.
STRONGHOLD had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 6 out of 6 matches.
STRONGHOLD showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 6 predictions (6 correct, 0 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

6/6 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Spirit 2-1 9z | 73% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-1 MOUZ | 68% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Aurora 1-2 Spirit | 70% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-1 FUT | 75% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Legacy 2-0 TYLOO | 67% Legacy | CORRECT |
| G2 2-0 BIG | 66% G2 | CORRECT |
The Cologne Major's Legends Stage closed last weekend with a near-perfect AI run from TIERELO (12 out of 15 — our highest Pickem score so far). Stage 3 just opened with all 16 teams now at the LANXESS arena. Here's what worked, what flopped, and what the models think happens next.
| Outcome | Teams |
|---|---|
| 3-0 | FUT, Spirit |
| 3-1 / 3-2 | G2, 9z, BetBoom, B8, Monte, Legacy |
| 2-3 / 1-3 | BIG, paiN, TYLOO, MIBR, M80, Astralis |
| 0-3 | FlyQuest, GamerLegion |
The story of Stage 2 is TIERELO. It is our highest Pickem score on cs2predict.gg so far — Stage 1's winner SENTINEL only managed 6/15. Here's TIERELO's bracket:
| Pick | Team | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 3-0 | Spirit | ✓ Spirit went 3-0 | +4 |
| 💀 0-3 | FlyQuest | ✓ FlyQuest went 0-3 | +4 |
| ⚡ Advance (4/7) | G2, Legacy, Monte, B8 | ✓ all four advanced | +4 |
| ⚡ Advance (3 misses) | Astralis, GamerLegion, paiN | ✗ all eliminated | +0 |
| Total | 12/15 | ||
Why TIERELO worked here: The model weights tier-3 teams by their ELO relative to bracket peers (not absolute), so it catches the right "tier-1 underdog runs the bracket" signals. Spirit going 3-0 was a non-consensus call — most models had Vitality or another top seed as the safer perfect-Swiss pick. And FlyQuest as 0-3 was unloved by exactly the kinds of models that overweight HLTV rank.
| # | Model | Score | 3-0 / 0-3 | Advance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | TIERELO | 12 | ✓ / ✓ | 4 / 7 |
| 🥈 | WR10COMBO | 11 | ✓ / ✓ | 3 / 7 |
| 🥉 | SURGE | 8 | ✓ / ✗ | 4 / 7 |
| #4 | ELO | 7 | ✓ / ✗ | 3 / 7 |
| #5 | ELOFACE | 7 | ✓ / ✗ | 3 / 7 |
| #6 | ELOHQ | 7 | ✓ / ✗ | 3 / 7 |
SURGE (our newest PRO-tier model, launched right before Stage 2) debuts at 3rd place on its very first Pickem event — both lines correct except for the 0-3 call. Nice start.
Two events in, the standings are starting to mean something:
| # | Model | Total Pts | Per event |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | WR10COMBO | 16 | 8.0 |
| 🥈 | TIERELO | 14 | 7.0 |
| 🥉 | TRIBUNAL | 10 | 5.0 |
| #4 | SENTINEL | 10 | 5.0 |
| #5 | TIER3ELO | 10 | 5.0 |
WR10COMBO is the only model on the site to nail both Pickem 4-point lines across two stages (3-0 and 0-3 in each event). Steady, dull, and almost certainly the one to bet on for Stage 3. Full table: /pickem/leaderboard/.
The Champions Stage just started in Cologne. 16 teams, BO3 throughout (a first for a CS2 Major), all Swiss, top 8 advance to playoffs. Field is the eight Stage 2 advancers (FUT, Spirit, G2, BetBoom, 9z, B8, Legacy, Monte) joined by the eight pre-qualified Champions seeds (Vitality, Natus Vincere, MOUZ, Falcons, FURIA, Aurora, The MongolZ, PARIVISION).
AI Consensus across our 28 models:
| Role | Consensus pick | Agree |
|---|---|---|
| 🏆 3-0 | Vitality | 16 / 28 (57%) |
| 💀 0-3 | BetBoom | 13 / 28 (46%) |
| ⚡ Top advancers | The MongolZ (82%), Falcons (75%), PARIVISION (64%), Natus Vincere (60%), MOUZ (60%), Spirit (57%), Aurora (53%) | |
The interesting story is BetBoom as consensus 0-3. They scraped through Stage 2 at 3-1 (avoiding elimination on the final map of their final match) and the models clearly read that as a fluke. If they go out 0-3 here, the models will look smart. If they make it through again, this becomes the Pickem upset of the Major.
And Vitality as 3-0 is mostly "trust the rank" — they're the world #1 entering Stage 3 and most models default to that. The interesting alternative comes from TIERELO (the Stage 2 winner) and a couple of others, who picked a different team to run the table. Click into /pickem/iem-cologne-major-2026-stage-3/ to see every model's individual bracket — and whether the meta-models that dominated Stage 2 agree on the upset call.
Predictions are live; the bracket fills in as the next four days play out. The cumulative leaderboard will update automatically once Stage 3 finalizes.
Heads-up: after Stage 3 closes (around June 14), the eight survivors head into a BO3 single-elim playoff bracket. We're working on a separate "champion / finalist / semifinalist" Pickem-style page for that — different scoring (4 + 4 + 1×2 = max 10), same idea.
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 24 · Jun 01 – Jun 07, 2026
This week (Week 24 · Jun 01 – Jun 07, 2026) we analyzed 58 top-tier CS2 matches across 27 prediction models. VANGUARD dominated with 85.7% accuracy (6/7 correct), ahead of TIER3 at 83.3%. VANGUARD achieved a Brier Score of 0.1258 and Log Loss of 0.4174.
VANGUARD had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 6 out of 7 matches.
VANGUARD showed excellent performance with 85.7% accuracy across 7 predictions (6 correct, 1 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

6/7 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Spirit 2-0 9z | 79% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Spirit 13-1 MIBR | 87% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Legacy 13-7 FlyQuest | 80% Legacy | CORRECT |
| Legacy 8-13 MIBR | 79% Legacy | WRONG |
| Spirit 13-5 BetBoom | 84% Spirit | CORRECT |
| 9z 13-9 FlyQuest | 77% 9z | CORRECT |
| GamerLegion 2-0 BIG | 73% GamerLegio | CORRECT |
Following up on our Stage 1 launch post, the IEM Cologne Major 2026 Stage 1 Swiss has wrapped. Here's what 27 AI models actually got right — and the new Pickem Leaderboard we just launched to track all of this going forward.
Stage 1 produced two 3-0 teams, two 0-3 teams, and six advancers:
The story of Stage 1 is HEROIC. They were the consensus 3-0 pick from 12 of 27 models — the heaviest concentration of any team on any pick. They went out at 1-3.
Meanwhile B8, who only one model (SENTINEL) called for 3-0, ran the table perfectly. That single non-consensus call is the entire reason SENTINEL won the event.
| # | Model | Pts | 3-0 pick | 0-3 pick | Advance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | SENTINEL | 6 | B8 ✓ | BetBoom ✗ | 2 / 7 |
| 🥈 | WR10COMBO | 5 | GamerLegion ✗ | SINNERS ✓ | 1 / 7 |
| 🥉 | HIGHORACLE | 4 | HEROIC ✗ | GamerLegion ✗ | 4 / 7 |
Three observations:
From now on, every model's Pickem performance accumulates across all completed Majors. The new /pickem/leaderboard/ page ranks all 27 models by cumulative HLTV-rule points, and each row is clickable for a per-event breakdown: who they picked, who they should have picked, and exactly how their score was assembled.
The leaderboard is permanent. Stage 2 results will roll in. So will every Major after that. The story of which AI model is actually the best at Pickem will be told over many events, not one.
tl;dr — Stage 1 favored the model that took a non-consensus swing. SENTINEL won by being the only model to call B8 perfect. The full leaderboard is at cs2predict.gg/pickem/leaderboard/.
Monthly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · June 2026
Based on May 2026 data, we tracked 139 top-tier CS2 matches across 26 prediction models with a total of 2456 predictions. The average model accuracy was 64.0%, with a spread of 27.6% between the best and worst performing models.
STRONGHOLD takes the top spot with 78.4% accuracy, followed by TIER3 at 75.4% and TIER at 72.0%.
STRONGHOLD showed excellent performance with 78.4% accuracy across 37 predictions (29 correct, 8 wrong). Best week: W18 at 100.0%, weakest: W22 at 40.0%.


TIER3 showed excellent performance with 75.4% accuracy across 57 predictions (43 correct, 14 wrong). Best week: W18 at 100.0%, weakest: W22 at 33.3%.


TIER showed strong performance with 72.0% accuracy across 75 predictions (54 correct, 21 wrong). Best week: W18 at 80.0%, weakest: W22 at 37.5%.


Below is the complete ranking of all models. Models highlighted in blue are in the top 3. The bar chart shows relative performance at a glance.

Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 23 · May 25 – May 31, 2026
This week (Week 23 · May 25 – May 31, 2026) we analyzed 23 top-tier CS2 matches across 24 prediction models. SQUAD dominated with 60.9% accuracy (14/23 correct), ahead of MIND at 50.0%. SQUAD achieved a Brier Score of 0.2732 and Log Loss of 0.8257.
SQUAD edged out the competition this week, though accuracy across all models was moderate.
SQUAD showed decent performance with 60.9% accuracy across 23 predictions (14 correct, 9 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

14/23 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| FOKUS 2-1 Nemiga | 90% FOKUS | CORRECT |
| Gentle Mates 0-2 Nemesis | 81% Nemesis | CORRECT |
| TDK 2-1 OG | 71% OG | WRONG |
| 100 Thieves 1-2 Nemesis | 67% Nemesis | CORRECT |
| magic 1-2 Ninjas in Pyjamas | 72% Ninjas in | CORRECT |
| FOKUS 2-1 fnatic | 77% FOKUS | CORRECT |
| Gentle Mates 2-0 GenOne | 89% Gentle Mat | CORRECT |
| Ninjas in Pyjamas 2-0 FaZe | 67% Ninjas in | CORRECT |
| Tricked 0-2 Nemiga | 89% Nemiga | CORRECT |
| Gentle Mates 2-1 Eternal Fire | 79% Gentle Mat | CORRECT |
| FaZe 2-0 Sharks | 70% Sharks | WRONG |
| 9z 1-2 FaZe | 68% FaZe | CORRECT |
| Nemesis 2-3 TDK | 88% Nemesis | WRONG |
| magic 2-1 FaZe | 56% FaZe | WRONG |
| HEROIC 1-2 9z | 72% HEROIC | WRONG |
| 3DMAX 1-2 Alliance | 93% 3DMAX | WRONG |
| 9z 1-2 Sharks | 83% Sharks | CORRECT |
| Eternal Fire 2-1 fnatic | 77% fnatic | WRONG |
| FaZe 2-0 Alliance | 61% Alliance | WRONG |
| Gentle Mates 2-0 ALGO | 73% Gentle Mat | CORRECT |
| HEROIC 0-2 Ninjas in Pyjamas | 64% Ninjas in | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 0-2 magic | 96% 3DMAX | WRONG |
| fnatic 2-0 Rune Eaters | 64% fnatic | CORRECT |
60.9% as the best model is the lowest weekly leader we've ever recorded on cs2predict.gg — normal weeks see the top model land between 75% and 85%. The drop wasn't a data glitch (we verified every match against HLTV directly). It was a real upset wave driven by an unusually packed tournament calendar.
Three top-tier events ran in parallel this stretch:
Plus Major qualifiers leading into Cologne. Top organisations split rosters, tested experimental lineups, and showed visible signs of late-season fatigue. The result: 7 matches where every single one of 18–22 active models was wrong.
| Match | Tournament | What happened |
|---|---|---|
| MongolZ vs B8 | CS Asia Championships | B8 won 2-1 (huge upset) |
| MIBR vs PARIVISION | CS Asia Championships | MIBR ran out 2-0 |
| NaVi vs Vitality | IEM Atlanta | NaVi took it 2-1 |
| B8 vs FUT | IEM Atlanta | B8 won 2-0 again |
| PARIVISION vs G2 | PGL Astana | G2 needed 3 maps |
| PARIVISION vs 9z | PGL Astana | 9z swept 2-0 |
| Aurora vs HEROIC | PGL Astana | HEROIC took it 2-0 |
The pattern: B8 (Ukrainian Tier-2) and PARIVISION (rising Russian roster) were involved in 5 of 7 of these matches. B8 ran the Cinderella story — taking down both MongolZ AND FUT in the same week.
When ELO-based, rank-based, and form-based models all converge on the same prediction and are all wrong, the only model that can stand out is one looking at something different. SQUAD does exactly that: it weights individual player ratings rather than team-level rank.
For a week dominated by:
SQUAD's player-first approach happened to fit. 60.9% isn't great absolutely — it's just that team-based models did far worse, because their signals were polluted by mid-tournament roster changes.
CS2's 2026 calendar is more packed than ever. When 3+ tournaments overlap, expect lower model agreement, more upsets in matches where rosters changed mid-week, and player-based models (SQUAD, WR10) gaining a temporary edge.
We're not adjusting any model weights based on a single week — that would be classic over-fitting. But it's a useful reminder: models are statistical, not magical. Stable meta produces high accuracy. Chaotic weeks produce chaotic predictions.
Major Cologne Stage 1 kicks off this week (June 2). It'll be interesting to see how models behave once the scene refocuses on one big event.
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 22 · May 18 – May 24, 2026
This week (Week 22 · May 18 – May 24, 2026) we analyzed 34 top-tier CS2 matches across 25 prediction models. WR10P dominated with 75.8% accuracy (25/33 correct), ahead of TRIBUNAL at 75.0%. WR10P achieved a Brier Score of 0.1981 and Log Loss of 0.5864.
WR10P had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 25 out of 33 matches.
WR10P showed excellent performance with 75.8% accuracy across 33 predictions (25 correct, 8 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

25/33 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 21 · May 11 – May 17, 2026
This week (Week 21 · May 11 – May 17, 2026) we analyzed 57 top-tier CS2 matches across 25 prediction models. STRONGHOLD dominated with 81.8% accuracy (9/11 correct), ahead of TIER at 80.0%. STRONGHOLD achieved a Brier Score of 0.1542 and Log Loss of 0.4943.
STRONGHOLD had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 9 out of 11 matches.
STRONGHOLD showed excellent performance with 81.8% accuracy across 11 predictions (9 correct, 2 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

9/11 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| GamerLegion 0-3 Natus Vincere | 68% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| BetBoom 0-2 Natus Vincere | 77% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| B8 0-2 Vitality | 80% Vitality | CORRECT |
| SINNERS 0-2 Astralis | 70% Astralis | CORRECT |
| FaZe 0-2 Vitality | 81% Vitality | CORRECT |
| BetBoom 2-1 Vitality | 83% Vitality | WRONG |
| Natus Vincere 2-1 GamerLegion | 69% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| Monte 2-1 The Huns | 67% Monte | CORRECT |
| HEROIC 1-2 magic | 62% HEROIC | WRONG |
| Natus Vincere 2-0 Passion UA | 74% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-0 BC.Game | 84% Vitality | CORRECT |
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 20 · May 04 – May 10, 2026
This week (Week 20 · May 04 – May 10, 2026) we analyzed 16 top-tier CS2 matches across 25 prediction models. STRONGHOLD dominated with 100.0% accuracy (8/8 correct), ahead of HIGH-ORACLE at 100.0%. STRONGHOLD achieved a Brier Score of 0.0677 and Log Loss of 0.2985.
STRONGHOLD had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 8 out of 8 matches.
STRONGHOLD showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 8 predictions (8 correct, 0 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

8/8 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Monte 2-0 magic | 65% Monte | CORRECT |
| PARIVISION 2-0 Fisher College | 75% PARIVISION | CORRECT |
| Aurora 2-0 The Huns | 76% Aurora | CORRECT |
| Falcons 2-0 K27 | 78% Falcons | CORRECT |
| Spirit 2-0 The Huns | 79% Spirit | CORRECT |
| MOUZ 2-1 Gentle Mates | 72% MOUZ | CORRECT |
| The MongolZ 2-0 magic | 76% The Mongol | CORRECT |
| G2 2-0 Fisher College | 73% G2 | CORRECT |
Monthly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · May 2026
Based on April 2026 data, we tracked 174 top-tier CS2 matches across 27 prediction models with a total of 2520 predictions. The average model accuracy was 72.3%, with a spread of 53.0% between the best and worst performing models.
TRIBUNAL takes the top spot with 100.0% accuracy, followed by NEXUS at 97.1% and SENTINEL at 92.3%.
TRIBUNAL showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 20 predictions (20 correct, 0 wrong).


NEXUS showed excellent performance with 97.1% accuracy across 35 predictions (34 correct, 1 wrong). Best week: W14 at 100.0%, weakest: W18 at 75.0%.


SENTINEL showed excellent performance with 92.3% accuracy across 26 predictions (24 correct, 2 wrong). Best week: W15 at 100.0%, weakest: W14 at 90.5%.


Below is the complete ranking of all models. Models highlighted in blue are in the top 3. The bar chart shows relative performance at a glance.

Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 19 · Apr 27 – May 03, 2026
This week (Week 19 · Apr 27 – May 03, 2026) we analyzed 20 top-tier CS2 matches across 24 prediction models. STRONGHOLD dominated with 100.0% accuracy (7/7 correct), ahead of STREAK at 91.7%. STRONGHOLD achieved a Brier Score of 0.0822 and Log Loss of 0.334.
STRONGHOLD had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 7 out of 7 matches.
STRONGHOLD showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 7 predictions (7 correct, 0 wrong).


Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.

7/7 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Vitality 2-0 GamerLegion | 79% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Natus Vincere 2-0 FaZe | 71% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| Natus Vincere 2-0 GamerLegion | 68% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-1 G2 | 75% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Natus Vincere 2-0 FaZe | 71% Natus Vinc | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-1 FUT | 76% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Legacy 3-2 9z | 62% Legacy | CORRECT |
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 18 · Apr 20 – Apr 27, 2026
This week (Week 18 · Apr 20 – Apr 27, 2026) we analyzed 13 top-tier CS2 matches across 24 prediction models. NEXUS dominated with 100.0% accuracy (9/9 correct), ahead of HIGH-ORACLE at 100.0%. NEXUS achieved a Brier Score of 0.0664 and Log Loss of 0.2942.
NEXUS had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 9 out of 9 matches.
NEXUS showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 9 predictions (9 correct, 0 wrong).
Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.
9/9 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| TYLOO 1-0 Sensation | 76% TYLOO | CORRECT |
| 9z 2-0 Vasco | 74% 9z | CORRECT |
| Wildcard 2-0 FRZ | 68% Wildcard | CORRECT |
| BIG 0-2 HEROIC | 68% HEROIC | CORRECT |
| Alliance 2-0 Oxuji | 69% Alliance | CORRECT |
| Legacy 2-0 Keyd Stars | 78% Legacy | CORRECT |
| 9z 2-0 Vasco | 80% 9z | CORRECT |
| Legacy 2-0 ALZON | 78% Legacy | CORRECT |
| 9z 2-0 ALKA | 80% 9z | CORRECT |
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 17 · Apr 13 – Apr 20, 2026
This week (Week 17 · Apr 13 – Apr 20, 2026) we analyzed 30 top-tier CS2 matches across 25 prediction models. NEXUS dominated with 100.0% accuracy (10/10 correct), ahead of STRONGHOLD at 100.0%. NEXUS achieved a Brier Score of 0.0884 and Log Loss of 0.3524.
NEXUS had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 10 out of 10 matches.
NEXUS showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 10 predictions (10 correct, 0 wrong).
Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.
10/10 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Spirit 0-3 Vitality | 71% Vitality | CORRECT |
| FURIA 0-2 Vitality | 68% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-0 Natus Vincere | 72% Vitality | CORRECT |
| HEROIC 1-0 illwill | 73% HEROIC | CORRECT |
| RED Canids 1-2 Spirit | 68% Spirit | CORRECT |
| FURIA 2-0 Passion UA | 71% FURIA | CORRECT |
| Legacy 1-2 MOUZ | 72% MOUZ | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 0-2 Falcons | 70% Falcons | CORRECT |
| Spirit 2-0 Liquid | 68% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Gentle Mates 1-2 G2 | 71% G2 | CORRECT |
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 16 · Apr 06 – Apr 13, 2026
This week (Week 16 · Apr 06 – Apr 13, 2026) we analyzed 50 top-tier CS2 matches across 25 prediction models. NEXUS dominated with 100.0% accuracy (12/12 correct), ahead of STRONGHOLD at 100.0%. NEXUS achieved a Brier Score of 0.0893 and Log Loss of 0.3546.
NEXUS had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 12 out of 12 matches.
NEXUS showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 12 predictions (12 correct, 0 wrong).
Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.
12/12 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Spirit 0-3 Vitality | 71% Vitality | CORRECT |
| FURIA 0-2 Vitality | 68% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-0 Natus Vincere | 72% Vitality | CORRECT |
| HEROIC 1-0 illwill | 73% HEROIC | CORRECT |
| RED Canids 1-2 Spirit | 68% Spirit | CORRECT |
| FURIA 2-0 Passion UA | 71% FURIA | CORRECT |
| Legacy 1-2 MOUZ | 72% MOUZ | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 0-2 Falcons | 70% Falcons | CORRECT |
| Spirit 2-0 Liquid | 68% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Gentle Mates 1-2 G2 | 71% G2 | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 0-2 The MongolZ | 69% The Mongol | CORRECT |
| BC.Game 2-1 Voca | 70% BC.Game | CORRECT |
Weekly digest · Top-tier CS2 matches · Week 15 · Mar 30 – Apr 06, 2026
This week (Week 15 · Mar 30 – Apr 06, 2026) we analyzed 193 top-tier CS2 matches across 27 prediction models. NEXUS dominated with 100.0% accuracy (22/22 correct), ahead of TRIBUNAL at 100.0%. NEXUS achieved a Brier Score of 0.0861 and Log Loss of 0.3457.
NEXUS had an outstanding week, correctly predicting 22 out of 22 matches.
NEXUS showed excellent performance with 100.0% accuracy across 22 predictions (22 correct, 0 wrong).
Complete model performance for the week. The leader is highlighted.
22/22 correct predictions on top-tier matches.
| MATCH | PREDICTION | RESULT |
|---|---|---|
| Spirit 0-3 Vitality | 71% Vitality | CORRECT |
| FURIA 0-2 Vitality | 68% Vitality | CORRECT |
| Vitality 2-0 Natus Vincere | 72% Vitality | CORRECT |
| HEROIC 1-0 illwill | 73% HEROIC | CORRECT |
| RED Canids 1-2 Spirit | 68% Spirit | CORRECT |
| FURIA 2-0 Passion UA | 71% FURIA | CORRECT |
| Legacy 1-2 MOUZ | 72% MOUZ | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 0-2 Falcons | 70% Falcons | CORRECT |
| Spirit 2-0 Liquid | 68% Spirit | CORRECT |
| Gentle Mates 1-2 G2 | 71% G2 | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 0-2 The MongolZ | 69% The Mongol | CORRECT |
| BC.Game 2-1 Voca | 70% BC.Game | CORRECT |
| paiN 3-1 Gaimin Gladiators | 72% paiN | CORRECT |
| PARIVISION 2-0 FOKUS | 74% PARIVISION | CORRECT |
| 3DMAX 2-1 Voca | 74% 3DMAX | CORRECT |
| FaZe 2-0 CYBERSHOKE | 68% FaZe | CORRECT |
| PARIVISION 2-1 Legacy | 69% PARIVISION | CORRECT |
| paiN 2-1 ShindeN | 81% paiN | CORRECT |
| GamerLegion 0-2 BetBoom | 68% BetBoom | CORRECT |
| Astralis 2-0 MIBR | 68% Astralis | CORRECT |
| B8 2-0 Wildcard | 68% B8 | CORRECT |
| NRG 2-0 Voca | 77% NRG | CORRECT |